Welcome to Banned Books Week 2014
The last week in September is always dedicated to bringing awareness to banned or challenged books. The American Library Association explains the difference more succinctly than I can: A challenge is an attempt to remove or restrict materials, based upon the objections of a person or group. A banning is the removal of those materials. Challenges do not simply involve a person expressing a point of view; rather, they are an attempt to remove material from the curriculum or library, thereby restricting the access of others. As such, they are a threat to freedom of speech and choice. So, is it okay for you to decide that you don't want to read a book that you find objectionable? Absolutely. Is it okay for you to decide that you don't want your child to read a book that you find objectionable? You betcha. (Although the allure of the forbidden may cause that route to backfire on you.) Is it okay for you to claim that a book is unfit for anyone to read and that it should be made unavailable to the public? No. Never. If I want to read something, that is my right. If you don't want to read something, that's your right. You don't tread on my space, I don't tread on yours. Easy enough, right? One would think. Books are challenged all the time. And not just classics like The Catcher in the Rye. Current books top the lists now. Here are the top five banned/challenged books of 2013, according to the ALA website: 1. Captain Underpants (series), by Dav Pilkey Reasons: Offensive language, unsuited for age group, violence 2. The Bluest Eye, by Toni Morrison Reasons: Offensive language, sexually explicit, unsuited to age group, violence 3. The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, by Sherman…
